These conditions aren't that far away for some companies that are not heavily diversified. It will have to be a company that is in a position where MS can't hurt them much more than they're hurting already. But since it's all or nothing, the stakes are very high for entities with a large MS dependant installed base. I personally think this type of CRM is what will provoke the first industry break with MS. But, no matter, since thay don't have to state why your pricing changed or you were put 'on allocation' for new products. But that has been held to be illegal in many places so the language disappeared. MS used to be quite blatant about exclusivity with their 'bare PC' pogroms and actual license language. This is why MS 'partners' seem to be all MS and nothing else. But in the real world, the reason this doesn't happen is that doing so would violate the (unspoken because they are illegal) exclusive licensing agreements with the monopoly.Īnd since they are heavily invested and completely dependant on Microsoft technology, they have a high degree of exposure to retaliation in pricing or more subtle areas. Hi Michael In a perfect world, yes, you could use any of a number of Open dbs to improve access and allow far more imaginative solutions. To an instance of Microsoft SQL Server 2005 from a remote computer, you might. Describes how to configure SQL Server 2005 to allow remote connections.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |